Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff failed to demonstrate a meritorious cause of action and a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with two conditional orders of preclusion. Accordingly, the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion by granting summary judgment in favor of the respondents dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them (see, Bailey v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 91 A.D.2d 967, affd 59 N.Y.2d 748; see also, Sigurdsson v Long Is. Jewish Hillside Med. Center, 114 A.D.2d 497; Crescenzo v McCabe Powers Body Co., 110 A.D.2d 619, lv dismissed 65 N.Y.2d 605, 923; Gass v. Gass, 101 A.D.2d 849). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.