AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS; JASPER BALLANCE; ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION; WILLIAM M. BENNET; CONWAY H. COLLIS; ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.; RICHARD NEVINS; GRAY DAVIS; AND BRUCE BUNNER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Substituted for Kenneth Cory, pursuant to Fed. R.App.P. 43(c)(1).

ORDER

The decision of the Supreme Court in Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 1549, 95 L.Ed.2d 39 (1987), does not alter the opinion's analysis. Pilot Life involves a state law of general application, one that directly conflicts with a substantive provision of ERISA. This case, in contrast, involves a state law directed specifically at the insurance industry, one that does not conflict with any of ERISA's substantive provisions. Accordingly, the analysis of Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts, 471 U.S. 724, 105 S.Ct. 2380, 85 L.Ed.2d 728 (1985), remains fully applicable.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for en banc hearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App.P. 35(b).

The petition for rehearing is denied, and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GENERAL MOTORS v. CAL. ST. BD. OF EQUALIZATION
(Aug 14, 1987)