Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Marriage of McCUNE, Respondent — Cross-Appellant, and McCUNE, Appellant — Cross-Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Judgment modified to award wife $500 permanent spousal support; provision requiring husband to maintain health insurance for benefit of wife stricken; affirmed as modified. Costs to wife on appeal.

PER CURIAM

On de novo review, we conclude that wife is entitled to $500 per month permanent spousal support. See Vinson and Vinson, 83 Or. App. 487, 732 P.2d 79, rev den 303 Or. 332 (1987).

On the cross-appeal, we agree with husband that the court erred in requiring, without any evidence of its cost, that he maintain health insurance benefits for wife.

Husband does not challenge the provision insofar as it requires that he maintain insurance for the benefit of the minor children.

Judgment modified to award wife $500 permanent spousal support; provision requiring husband to maintain health insurance for benefit of wife stricken; affirmed as modified. Costs to wife on appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McCUNE AND McCUNE
(Sep 2, 1987)