Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAMS v. GREENFIELD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC.

DEEN, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court violated OCGA § 9-10-182 by allowing two attorneys to argue for the defendant during closing argument. Both the plaintiff and the defendant employed double counsel. One attorney for the plaintiff began closing argument; the two defense attorneys then argued; and the plaintiff's second attorney concluded the argument. Under Taylor v. Powell, 158 Ga. App. 339 ( 280 S.E.2d 386) (1981), this procedure did not violate OCGA § 9-10-182.

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong, C. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DEEN, Presiding Judge.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1987 — REHEARING DENIED SEPTEMBER 16, 1987 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLIAMS v. GREENFIELD EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC
(Sep 8, 1987)