Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. ZURANSKI, APPELLANT.

Criminal law — Aggravated murder — Remand of case to trial court following vacation of death sentence, but affirmance of guilt-phase proceedings — Trial court may not reimpose death sentence — Only option is life imprisonment.

This cause (court of appeals No. 50447) is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. XV only, and as so allowed is reversed on authority of State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 369, 513 N.E.2d 744, and remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with that decision.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, LOCHER, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT AND H. BROWN, JJ., concur.

HOLMES, J., dissents.

HOLMES, J, dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 369, 513 N.E.2d 744.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. ZURANSKI
(Sep 16, 1987)