Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GENEVIEVE ARNAULT JACKSON, Also Known as GENEVIEVE H. JACKSON, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant's primary argument in this court is that her conviction must be reversed because she was denied effective assistance of counsel during the trial. After examining the record and viewing the evidence, law and circumstances of the case in totality, we conclude defendant's allegations of counsel's ineffectiveness are not supported by the record and she was not denied meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146-147).

We concur with the Appellate Division's disposition of defendant's remaining contentions (see, 121 A.D.2d 743).

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur; Judge TITONE taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JACKSON
(Oct 8, 1987)