AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK PAUL BRAUN, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion (see, CPL 220.60) in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea (see, People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 524-525; People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 927). The defendant's conclusory assertions that he was "under a great amount of pressure" and did not understand "what he was doing" because he was on "medication" are refuted by the record of the plea allocution (see, People v. Corwise, 120 A.D.2d 604; People v King, 110 A.D.2d 856). Accordingly, the defendant was not entitled to withdraw his plea. Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BRAUN
(Oct 13, 1987)