Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Compensation of Carl A. Anfora, Claimant. ANFORA, Petitioner — Cross-Respondent, v. LIBERTY COMMUNICATIONS et al, Respondents — Cross-Petitioners, and CABLE COMMUNICATIONS et al, Respondents — Cross-Respondents.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded on petition and on cross-petition with instructions to reinstate referee's opinion and order.

PER CURIAM

Claimant and Liberty Communications, claimant's first employer, and Fireman's Fund Insurance, that employer's insurer, seek judicial review of the Workers' Compensation Board's order holding that claimant's present disability is the result of an aggravation of a back injury he suffered in 1982 while working for Liberty Communications. In so holding, the Board reversed the referee, who had determined that claimant's present disability is a result of a new injury he suffered while working for Cable Communications in 1984.

On de novo review, we are persuaded that the referee was correct. Smith v. Ed's Pancake House, 27 Or. App. 361, 565 P.2d 138 (1976).

Reversed and remanded on petition and on cross-petition with instructions to reinstate referee's opinion and order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ANFORA v. LIBERTY COMMUNICATIONS
(Oct 21, 1987)