Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILSON v. CITY OF ATLANTA et al.

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Donald P. Wilson filed an action against the City of Atlanta and R. N. Owen, T. A. Sturgis, J. L. Stroud, F. D. Echols, E. A. Bell and Morris Redding, and on March 7, 1986, the trial court granted the defendant individuals' motion to dismiss for insufficiency of service of process. Subsequently, on October 6, 1986, the trial court granted the City of Atlanta's motion to dismiss based on plaintiff's failure to comply with Georgia's ante-litem notice statute, OCGA § 36-33-5. Plaintiff appeals. Held:

In two enumerations of error, plaintiff contends that he had no notice of the defendant individuals' motion to dismiss or the City of Atlanta's motion to dismiss. A review of the record reveals no point at which plaintiff raised these issues. "`Enumerations of error which raise questions for the first time on appeal present nothing for decision. (Cits.)' Green v. State, 170 Ga. App. 806-807 ( 318 S.E.2d 513) (1984)." Lane v. State, 180 Ga. App. 168, 169 (4) ( 348 S.E.2d 711). In any event, the record shows without contradiction that plaintiff was served by mail with notice of both defendants' and the City of Atlanta's motions to dismiss pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-5 (b). See Allen v. Bd. of Tax Assessors of Paulding County, 247 Ga. 568 ( 277 S.E.2d 660). Consequently, plaintiff's enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed. Sognier and Beasley, JJ., concur.

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

DECIDED OCTOBER 26, 1987.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILSON v. CITY OF ATLANTA
(Oct 26, 1987)