AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of JOSHUA LINER, Petitioner, v. RONALD E. MILES, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Main, J.

Petitioner, an inmate at Great Meadow Correctional Facility, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rule 109.12, which states that inmates are to follow all facility regulations and staff directions relating to movement within the facility ( 7 NYCRR 270.1 [b] [10] [iii]). According to the misbehavior report, petitioner refused to leave his cell one morning at the time his cell was opened. After reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services determination is not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the determination should be annulled and petitioner's records expunged of any reference to the incident. Inasmuch as this is a CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner is not entitled to money damages (see, Matter of Johnson v. Smith, 112 A.D.2d 50, 51, affd 66 N.Y.2d 697).

Determination annulled, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Main, Casey and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF LINER v. MILES
(Oct 22, 1987)