AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID PIPARO, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's sentence, three concurrent terms of imprisonment of 9 to 18 years, was within the range of possible sentences promised by the court when the guilty plea was entered and was not excessive (see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

Furthermore, the claims raised in the defendant's pro se supplemental brief rely on facts not contained in the record and, consequently, are not reviewable by this court (see, People v Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852). The defendant's assertion that this appeal is also from an order of the County Court denying his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10 is incorrect, because leave to appeal from the denial of such a motion was never sought or granted (see, CPL 450.15; 460.15). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PIPARO
(Nov 2, 1987)