Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Re v. ew/Respondent on Re

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petitions for review of the State of Oregon and the defendant are denied. The supplemental petition for review of the State of Oregon is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issue raised in the supplemental petition of the State of Oregon.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petitions for review of the State of Oregon and the defendant are denied. The supplemental petition for review of the State of Oregon is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issue raised in the supplemental petition of the State of Oregon.

Peterson, C.J., and Jones, J., would have allowed review on the original petitions of the State of Oregon and defendant.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. TUCKER
(Nov 4, 1987)