Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • G. William Bissett, of Preddy, Kutner, Hardy, Rubinoff, Brown Thompson, Miami, for
  • Pomeroy, Betts Pomeroy, Fort Lauderdale,
  • William Liston
  • Steven R. Berger of Steven R. Berger, P.A., Miami, for appellee City of Pembroke
  • Patrick W. Gent of Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson Casey, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee City of
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • G. William Bissett, of Preddy, Kutner, Hardy, Rubinoff, Brown Thompson, Miami, for
  • Pomeroy, Betts Pomeroy, Fort Lauderdale,
  • William Liston
  • Steven R. Berger of Steven R. Berger, P.A., Miami, for appellee City of Pembroke
  • Patrick W. Gent of Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson Casey, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee City of
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

MARTIN LOVE, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; CITY OF MIRAMAR, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; AND BROWARD COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. In our view the record reflects an issue of fact as to whether the condition of the roadway was a legal cause of the accident in question and an issue of fact as to whether one or all of the appellees were responsible for the maintenance of the roadway at the time in question.

ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

LOVE v. CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES
(Nov 13, 1987)