Appeal unanimously dismissed with costs. Memorandum: We hold that an order deferring determination of a motion to compel discovery until after an in camera inspection of certain materials by the court does not affect a substantial right (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; cf., Howell v. Independent Union, 112 A.D.2d 754; Bagdy v. Progresso Foods Corp., 86 A.D.2d 589). A party aggrieved by an order entered after the court's in camera inspection may take an appeal (see, Matter of Summers v. Faust, 110 A.D.2d 643).