Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

JANE HODGSON, M.D.; ARTHUR HOROWITZ, M.D.; NADINE T., JANET T., ELLEN Z., HEATHER P., MARY J., SHARON L., KATHY M., AND JUDY M., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED; DIANE P., SARAH L. AND JACKIE H.; MEADOWBROOK WOMEN'S CLINIC, P.A., PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MINNESOTA, A NONPROFIT MINNESOTA CORPORATION; MIDWEST HEALTH CENTER FOR WOMEN, P.A., A NONPROFIT MINNESOTA CORPORATION; WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER OF DULUTH, A NONPROFIT MINNESOTA CORPORATION, APPELLEES, v. THE STATE OF MINNESOTA; RUDY PERPICH AS GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA; HUBERT H. HUMPHREY, III, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing by the panel is granted and the opinion of this court previously filed, 827 F.2d 1191 (8th Cir. 1987), together with the judgment entered in accordance with it, is vacated and withdrawn. This case will be held in abeyance pending a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Hartigan v. Zbaraz, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 267, 93 L.Ed.2d 245 (1987). In view of the above order the petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HODGSON v. STATE OF MINN
(Nov 13, 1987)