APOLLO v. KIM ANH PHAM, N.J. Super. App. Div., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Edward J. Bowen argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent ( Edward J. Bowen on the brief). Robert C. Rivas argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant ( Bergen County Legal Services, attorneys; Robert C. Rivas on the brief).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Edward J. Bowen argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent ( Edward J. Bowen on the brief). Robert C. Rivas argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant ( Bergen County Legal Services, attorneys; Robert C. Rivas on the brief).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

BENJAMIN APOLLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. KIM ANH PHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division denying a trial by jury is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Sorkow in his opinion reported at 192 N.J. Super. 427 (Ch.Div. 1983).

(The balance of the opinion which disposes of essentially factual issues in the same case decided by another judge is omitted from this publication.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

APOLLO v. KIM ANH PHAM

BENJAMIN APOLLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. KIM ANH PHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT.

Comments