Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GARY KERPA v. A A BROTHERS, INC., ET AL.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff's first, second and sixth claims of error were not raised in the trial court; consequently, we will not consider those claims. The plaintiff's third, fourth and fifth claims of error invoke the discretionary function of the court. Our review of the record, transcript and briefs fails to disclose any abuse of such discretion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KERPA v. A A BROTHERS, INC
(Dec 22, 1987)