Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. ARTURO ARRIAGADA, RESPONDENT.

OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review State v. Arriagada, 508 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), in which the state sought review of a pretrial order suppressing certain identification testimony. The district court found this type of pretrial order nonreviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c). The district court also found that certiorari was not available as a means for review. The court acknowledged direct conflict with State v. Wilson, 483 So.2d 23 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), and certified the following as a question of great public importance.

Whether the holdings in Jones v. State, [ 477 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1985)]; State v. G.P., [ 476 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1985)]; and State v. C.C., [ 476 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1985)], preclude the state from seeking common law certiorari review of non-appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases.

508 So.2d at 1248.

We recently answered this question in the negative in State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1988). Accordingly, we quash Arriagada and remand to the district court for consideration consistent with Pettis.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. ARRIAGADA
(Jan 21, 1988)