Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGE H. RUDING, JR. AND E.F. HUTTON COMPANY, INC., APPELLANTS/CROSS APPELLEES, v. HUGH G. THOMPSON, JR., APPELLEE/CROSS APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment which awarded damages of $32,184 to the plaintiff, Hugh G. Thompson, Jr., based on fraudulent misrepresentation. George H. Ruding and E.F. Hutton and Company, defendants, appeal. No reversible error having been made to appear, we affirm as to the main appeal.

Mr. Thompson cross appeals saying that the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict on his claim for punitive damages. Based upon the authority of First Interstate Development Corp. v. Ablanedo, 511 So.2d 536 (Fla. 1987), we agree that reversible error was committed when the trial court disallowed Mr. Thompson's claim for punitive damages against Mr. Ruding.

Thus, as to the cross appeal, we affirm the directed verdict on punitive damages as concerns E.F. Hutton and Company. We reverse the directed verdict on punitive damages as concerns Mr. Ruding and remand for a new trial solely as to Mr. Ruding on the punitive damages issue.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded with instructions.

DOWNEY, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUDING v. THOMPSON
(Jan 29, 1988)