Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record in the present case, including the minutes of the Grand Jury proceedings, provides an adequate basis upon which to conclude that any prearrest showup procedure was purely confirmatory in that the complaining witness knew the identity of the defendant. The court therefore did not err in summarily denying the defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony (see, People v Kearn, 118 A.D.2d 871; see also, People v Robles, 122 A.D.2d 234, 235, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 917; People v Marrero, 110 A.D.2d 785; People v Stanton, 108 A.D.2d 688, 689; cf., People v Rubio, 118 A.D.2d 879). We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find that they are either not preserved for appellate review or meritless. Bracken, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.