AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

3C ASSOCIATES et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. IC LP REALTY CO., Appellant-Respondent, et al., Defendants.

As correctly determined by the court below, this is a foreclosure proceeding and, thus, the prepayment penalty of $150,000 provided in paragraph 21 of the mortgage rider has not been invoked. The terms of paragraph 21 make clear that said sum is an obligation which becomes due and payable only if there is a voluntary exercise of the right to prepay. Given that the accelerated payment here is the result of plaintiffs mortgagees having elected to bring this foreclosure action, they may not exact a prepayment penalty. (George H. Nutman, Inc. v Aetna Business Credit, 115 Misc.2d 168.)

Separate and distinct from any prepayment penalty, however, is the obligation that defendant mortgagor incurred pursuant to the terms of the payment provision of the mortgage, which specifies monthly interest rates of 13.6365% and, in addition, that "the sum of $60,000 as additional accrued interest shall be paid on July 1, 1986". Defendant agreed to this provision of the mortgage and is, accordingly, bound thereby.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Kassal, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

3C ASSOCIATES v. IC LP REALTY CO
(Feb 18, 1988)