Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

PEOPLE v HART (AFTER REMAND)

AFTER REMAND

PER CURIAM.

In our previous opinion in this case, reported at 161 Mich. App. 630; 411 N.W.2d 803 (1987), we remanded the case to the trial court, directing it to apply the standard of Batson v Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79; 106 S Ct 1712; 90 L Ed 2d 69 (1986), to defendant's equal protection claim regarding the alleged intentional exclusion of black veniremen by the prosecution.

On remand and following a hearing on the issue, the trial court ruled that defendant failed to make out a prima facie case of discrimination as required by Batson, supra. We find sufficient record support for the trial court's findings and, therefore, find no abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HART (AFT REM)
(Mar 4, 1988)