AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARLON BRANDOW, Appellant.

Mercure, J.

In March 1986, defendant was sentenced to 6 months in jail and 5 years' probation following his conviction for burglary in the third degree. In April 1987, defendant was charged with having violated the terms and conditions of probation by failing to report to his probation officer; failing to remain within the jurisdiction of the court; failing to notify his probation officer of changes in his address and employment; and committing the subsequent offense of petit larceny. After a negotiated plea, defendant was resentenced to an indeterminate term of 1 1/3 to 4 years' imprisonment.

The sole contention on appeal is that the sentence was unduly harsh. We disagree. Defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed (see, People v. Graham, 110 A.D.2d 715). Additionally, the record confirms that defendant has a lengthy prior criminal history and that he did not take advantage of the opportunties which probation provided to him. That he has a history of drug and alcohol abuse does not excuse his disregard for his probation obligations. Nor are we persuaded that defendant's unfortunate affliction with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is an extraordinary circumstance warranting interference with the sentence imposed. In our view, County Court did not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence within the statutory guidelines (see, People v. Donato, 112 A.D.2d 535; People v. Jones, 85 A.D.2d 50).

Judgment affirmed. Kane, J.P., Casey, Levine, Harvey and Mercure, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BRANDOW
(Apr 14, 1988)