AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of JOSEPH LURIA et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. GEORGE J. CONKLIN, JR., et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Ordered that the appeals by George J. Conklin, Jr., and Herbert Reisman, from the order dated April 24, 1986, are dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated May 22, 1986 is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment dated April 24, 1986, is dismissed, as it was superseded by the order dated May 22, 1986 made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated May 22, 1986 is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioners are awarded one bill of costs.

The petition for incorporation was legally insufficient in that it did not include a complete list of the regular inhabitants of the territory in accordance with the clear statutory mandate (see, Village Law § 2-202 [c] [2]; Matter of Village of Viola Hills [Lempert — Conklin], 129 A.D.2d 579, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 602).

Moreover the former Supervisor of the Town of Ramapo was precluded from approving the petition because it consisted of territories which were part of other incorporation petitions then in the appellate process. The Supervisor should have waited until the appellate process was complete in order to avoid the possibly undesired result of one piece of property being part of two different incorporated villages in contravention of the statutory mandate (see, Village Law § 2-200; § 2-208 [3]). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF LURIA v. CONKLIN
(Apr 18, 1988)