Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HOFFMANN, Plaintiff, and ROTH, Appellant, v. STOLL et al, Respondents.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or. App. 340, 717 P.2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or. 155 (1986).

Newman, J., dissenting.

NEWMAN, J., dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated by Warren, J., in his dissent in Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or. App. 340, 348, 717 P.2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or. 155 (1986).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOFFMANN AND ROTH v. STOLL
(Apr 19, 1988)