Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

William C. ADAMS, Respondent v. DAILY TELEGRAPH PRINTING CO., d/b/a WBTWTV 13; Eastern Carolinas Broadcasting Co., Inc., d/b/a WPDE TV 15; BobbyL. Hicks; and Gwen Cooper Hicks, Of Whom Daily Telegraph Printing Co.,d/b/a WBTW TV 13 is Petitioner.

Heard March 8, 1988.

Decided April 25, 1988.

Per Curiam:

Reference is had to the opinion of the Court of Appeals for a full statement of the facts. We affirm the result, but clarify one matter in the opinion.

292 S.C. 273, 356 S.E.2d 118 (Ct.App. 1987).

The opinion of the Court of Appeals shall not be read to hold that qualified privilege applies only in the case of a public figure or official. Although a First Amendment privilege extends only to an action by a public figure or official, there are numerous other qualified privileges which may apply to a private person. Prosser and Keeton on Torts, § 113, pp. 805-7; § 115 (5th ed. 1984). This Court has repeatedly so held. See, e.g., Abofreka v. Alston Tobacco Co., 288 S.C. 122, 341 S.E.2d 622 (1986); Duckworth v. First National Bank, 254 S.C. 563, 176 S.E.2d 297 (1970); Jones v. Garner, 250 S.C. 479, 158 S.E.2d 909 (1968); Cullum v. Dun Bradstreet, Inc., 228 S.C. 384, 90 S.E.2d 370 (1956).

We, of course, express no opinion on its applicability to this litigation, upon trial.

Affirmed as modified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ADAMS v. DAILY TELEGRAPH PRINTING CO
(Apr 25, 1988)