AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LAURA ACCESSORIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. A.P.A. WAREHOUSES, INC., Appellant. GWERTZMAN, PFEFFER, TOKER LEFKOWITZ et al., Respondents.

APA's insurance company assigned counsel to represent APA in this action by a lessee of APA's warehouse for damages from losses due to burglary at the warehouse. Counsel moved to withdraw on the grounds that APA violated the terms of the insurance policy by failing to notify the insurance company of the claim as soon as practicable.

The right to deny coverage is not properly tested by a motion of counsel to withdraw. The issue can only be resolved by a declaratory judgment action in which the defendant would be able to adequately litigate the facts of its disclaimer. The IAS court's decision, in effect, validated the disclaimer without the opportunity of the insured to be heard. (Brothers v Burt, 27 N.Y.2d 905; Monaghan v Meade, 91 A.D.2d 1014, 1015; Presley v Williams, 57 A.D.2d 947.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LAURA ACCESSORIES, INC. v. A.P.A. WAREHOUSES
(May 10, 1988)