Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CONTEL CREDIT CORPORATION, APPELLEE, v. ROSENBLATT, D.B.A. ORWELL COACH LINES, APPELLANT.

Appellate procedure — Failure to comply with App. R. 12(A) — Frivolous appeal — Sanctions — Award of attorney fees.

O.Jur 3d Appellate Review §§ 424, 427.

Where an appellant fails to comply with App. R. 12(A) by not briefing and arguing his assigned errors, the court may summarily reject his appeal and order him to pay attorney fees pursuant to App. R. 23.

MARKUS, J.

Defendant presents ten assigned errors. However, his brief contains nothing more than a list of the proposed errors. He has failed to comply with App. R. 12(A), which requires an appellant to brief and argue each assigned error separately. Therefore, we summarily reject the defendant's appeal. Further, pursuant to App. R. 23, we direct that appellant shall pay appellee $100 toward appellee's attorney fees in defending a frivolous appeal.

Judgment accordingly.

NAHRA, C.J., and ANN MCMANAMON, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CONTEL CREDIT CORP. v. ROSENBLATT
(May 16, 1988)