AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AGUSTIN MEDINA, Appellant.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant argues on appeal that the sentence imposed constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of constitutional proscriptions (NY Const, art I, § 5; US Const 8th Amend). "[O]rdinarily a sentence that is within statutory limits does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment absent exceptional circumstances" (People v Albano, 124 A.D.2d 739, 740, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 824). We find no such exceptional circumstances at bar. The record reflects that the trial court considered the defendant's background, his lack of a prior criminal history and the circumstances of the crime before imposing a sentence which was less than the maximum permissible term for a class B violent felony offender. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MEDINA
(May 16, 1988)