Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SEAWINDS, LTD., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEDLLOYD LINES, B.V.; ROYAL NEDLLOYD GROUP, N.V.; KNSM LINES, B.V.; AMERICAN PRESIDENT COMPANIES, LTD.; AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. SEA-LAND CORPORATION; SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC.; DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET AF 1912 A/S; A/S DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET SVENDBORG; A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK LINE; HAPAG-LLOYD AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT (ICT) B.V., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

ORDER

The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in its opinion. See Seawinds Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V., 80 B.R. 181 (N.D. Cal. 1987).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SEAWINDS LTD. v. NEDLLOYD LINES
(May 16, 1988)