AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

FOXFIRE ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. ENTERPRISE HOLDING CORP. et al., Defendants, and SAMUEL WEINBAUM et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the award of sanctions is stricken.

The court lacked inherent power to impose monetary sanctions for frivolous motion practice. As there is no statutory provision or court rule permitting the imposition of sanctions, the order herein must be reversed as a matter of law notwithstanding the fact that duplicative motions were made by the plaintiff (see, Matter of A.G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 N.Y.2d 1; Ltown Ltd. Partnership v Sire Plan, 69 N.Y.2d 670; Guma v Guma, 132 A.D.2d 645; Claybourne v City of New York, 128 A.D.2d 667). Lawrence, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FOXFIRE ENTERPRISES, INC. v. ENTER. HOLDING
(May 23, 1988)