AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

FELIX BERMAN, Appellant, v. MORRIS GOLDSMITH, Respondent.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The three-year Statute of Limitations period, applicable in conversion and replevin actions (CPLR 214), ordinarily runs from the date the conversion takes place. However, where possession is originally lawful, a demand is necessary. The period within which the action must be commenced is computed from the time when the right to make the demand is complete (see, CPLR 206 [a]; Al-Roc Prods. Corp. v Union Dime Sav. Bank, 74 A.D.2d 834, appeal dismissed 50 N.Y.2d 928; Federal Ins. Co. v Fries, 78 Misc.2d 805; 23 N.Y. Jur 2d, Conversion, § 62).

In the instant action, the plaintiff's right to demand the relinquishment of the subject chattel was complete on December 14, 1982, the date it was sold to the defendant at a Sheriff's sale. Therefore, the plaintiff's causes of action sounding in conversion and replevin, which were interposed in September of 1986, were properly deemed to be barred by the three-year limitations period. Bracken, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BERMAN v. GOLDSMITH
(Jun 6, 1988)