Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROMANCHIK, APPELLANT, v. LUCAK, APPELLEE, ET AL.

Civil procedure — Appellate procedure — Improper venue is not grounds for dismissal of action — Ruling on motion for change of venue is interlocutory.

O.Jur 2d Venue §§ 39, 46.

1. Improper venue is not grounds for dismissal of an action.

2. An order granting or denying a motion for change of venue is interlocutory and not subject to review until final judgment is rendered in the new jurisdiction.

Per Curiam.

Improper venue is not grounds for dismissal of an action. Price v. Wheeling Dollar Savings Trust Co. (1983), 9 Ohio App.3d 315, 9 OBR 581, 460 N.E.2d 264. Civ. R. 3(C)(1) provides that the trial court shall transfer the cause to the county where venue lies. Accordingly, we sustain the plaintiff's first assignment of error.

An order granting or denying a motion for change of venue is interlocutory and not subject to review until final judgment is rendered in the new jurisdiction. State, ex rel. Starner, v. DeHoff (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 163, 18 OBR 219, 480 N.E.2d 449; State, ex rel. Allied Chem. Co., v. Aurelius (1984), 16 Ohio App.3d 69, 16 OBR 73, 474 N.E.2d 618; Timson v. Young (1980), 70 Ohio App.2d 239, 24 O.O. 3d 309, 436 N.E.2d 538. Thus, we overrule the plaintiff's second assignment of error.

Judgment reversed and remanded for transfer of the cause.

Judgment accordingly.

PRYATEL, P.J., ANN MCMANAMON and MARKUS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROMANCHIK v. LUCAK
(Jun 14, 1988)