AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID MOORE, Appellant.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

We find no merit to the defendant's contention that the sentence imposed constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of constitutional proscriptions (NY Const, art I, § 5; US Const 8th Amend; People v Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, cert denied 423 U.S. 950; People v Albano, 124 A.D.2d 739, 740, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 824). Furthermore, as the sentence imposed was the result of a negotiated plea, the defendant may not now be heard to complain that it was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MOORE
(Jun 20, 1988)