PER CURIAM.
In this case the trial court found both parents equally fit to raise the minor child. However, the trial court granted custody of the child to the father because of his further finding that the mother was at fault in causing the divorce by her adulterous conduct. The trial court's ruling was based on OCGA § 19-9-1(a) which provides in part: "In all cases in which a divorce is granted, the party not in default shall be entitled to the custody of the minor children of the marriage." However, this part of the statute is overridden by the rule that "[a]s between parents the right of custody depends upon what will promote the welfare of the children." Gunnells v. Gunnells, 225 Ga. 188, 189 (1) ( 167 S.E.2d 138) (1969).
While the trial court may consider the conduct of the parties on the issue of custody, see Harris v. Harris, 240 Ga. 276, 277 ( 240 S.E.2d 30) (1977), the court ultimately must decide the custody question based on the best interest of the child.
We remand the case to the trial court for further consideration of the custody question in light of this opinion. See Lifsey v. Lifsey, 256 Ga. 613 ( 351 S.E.2d 637) (1987).
Case remanded. All the Justices concur.
PER CURIAM.
DECIDED JUNE 23, 1988 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED JULY 13, 1988.