Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

SAVERY CHEVROLET CO., INC. vs. HAROLD F. BISIENERE another.

Paragraph (3) of the judgment is vacated. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed. The order denying the motion for judgment n.o.v. or for a new trial is affirmed. The case is remanded to the Superior Court for findings of fact and conclusions of law consistent with this opinion and the entry of a new judgment on the G.L.c. 93A claim. In this connection, the judge may, in her discretion, invite from the parties written memoranda and oral argument.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SAVERY CHEVROLET CO., INC. v. BISIENERE
(Jul 1, 1988)