Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CRECELIUS v. BROOKS.

WELTNER, Justice.

The former wife filed a modification petition in 1986, pursuant to a divorce decree of 1982. The trial court awarded her attorney fees under OCGA § 19-6-19 (d), which became effective in 1984.

OCGA § 19-6-19 (d) permits an award of attorney fees to the prevailing party "[i]n proceedings for the modification of alimony for the support of a spouse or child pursuant to the provisions of this Code section."

1. The issue of attorney fees in divorce cases is remedial and ought to be considered broadly by the trial court. See generally OCGA § 1-3-5 and Bryan v. Bryan, 242 Ga. 826, 828-9 ( 251 S.E.2d 566) (1979). Accordingly, we will apply this provision to modification petitions filed after its effective date, without regard to the date of the underlying decree.

2. To the extent that Norman v. Norman, 255 Ga. 32 ( 334 S.E.2d 687) (1985) might indicate to the contrary — as to attorney fees — it is disapproved. Compare Haselden v. Haselden, 255 Ga. 366, 368 ( 338 S.E.2d 257) (1986). Summerlin v. Summerlin, 247 Ga. 5 ( 274 S.E.2d 523) (1981), relating only to modification, is inapplicable.

3. The trial court's award of attorney fees was not error.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

WELTNER, Justice.

DECIDED JULY 1, 1988.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRECELIUS v. BROOKS
(Jul 1, 1988)