Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HALLIGAN et al. v. CONSOLIDATED MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. et al.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Court of Appeals' reversal of a summary judgment granted to the defendant. Consolidated Management sued Halligan and his firm of certified public accountants for negligent tax return preparation. Halligan moved for summary judgment after offering in evidence the conviction of the owner of Consolidated Management for income tax fraud and the trial court granted the motion. Consolidated Management Services, Inc. v. Halligan, 186 Ga. App. 621 ( 368 S.E.2d 148) (1988).

We interpret the Court of Appeals' holding to say that a party's conviction in a criminal action does not constitute a bar to that party's prosecuting a civil action involving the same subject matter. In essence, the Court of Appeals held the conviction does not amount to collateral estoppel. Because we attach no broader implications to the holding, we affirm.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Hunt, J., not participating.

PER CURIAM.

DECIDED JULY 6, 1988 — RECONSIDERATION JULY 29, 1988.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HALLIGAN v. CONSOLIDATED MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC
(Jul 6, 1988)