AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GIOVANNI NOLASCO, Appellant.

Kane, J.P.

Following an altercation with another inmate in the prison yard at Elmira Correctional Facility in Chemung County, defendant was observed dropping an object to the ground by a correction officer standing some 5 to 10 yards away. The officer later testified at defendant's trial that he proceeded immediately to the scene, never removing his eyes from the object on the ground and picked it up. It was a homemade weapon known as a "shank", consisting of a razor blade melted into a toothbrush.

It is defendant's contention that he never possessed such a weapon, and he so testified at trial. However, the jury rejected his testimony and accepted that of the correction officer, which is their exclusive province in passing upon issues of credibility (see, People v. Joyiens, 39 N.Y.2d 197, 203). Accordingly, since the evidence presented must be viewed in the light most favorable to the People (People v. Bracey, 41 N.Y.2d 296, 302), defendant's challenge to this credibility determination must fail.

We also reject defendant's contentions that it was error to admit into evidence the rule book providing standards for inmates' behavior on the ground that at the time he received a copy of the rules, they were not filed with the Secretary of State and thus were of no force and effect at the time of this prosecution, and that Penal Law § 205.00 (3) is unconstitutional (see, People v. Anderson, 127 A.D.2d 885). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Kane, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Harvey and Mercure, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. NOLASCO
(Jul 14, 1988)