Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ALBERT SINE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF SADIE GOLD, APPELLANT, v. SONYA DAVIDSON, STUART DAVIDSON, SCOTT DAVIDSON, JEFFREY DAVIDSON, AND MARY UBOGY, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court's order appointing an administrator ad litem to investigate and contest, if necessary, a will already admitted to probate. No jeopardy to the estate has been demonstrated by any person with standing. More important, however, is the fact that the trial court's order imposes a duty beyond those authorized by law. See In re Lewis' Estate, 411 So.2d 368 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Woolf v. Reed, 389 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

It also appears that the trial court's order denying summary judgment does not accurately reflect the court's ruling that the will contestants lacked standing and should be corrected by entry of an order granting summary judgment.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SINE v. DAVIDSON
(Sep 6, 1988)