Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA/COUNCIL OF PUBLIC WORKERS, APPELLEE, v. STATE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLANT, ET AL.

Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.

This appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

MOYER, C.J., LOCHER, HOLMES and WRIGHT, JJ., concur.

SWEENEY and DOUGLAS, JJ., dissent with opinion.

H. BROWN, J., dissents.

DOUGLAS, J., dissenting.

I dissent to the majority's dismissal of this appeal as having been improvidently allowed.

The instant case presents this court with an excellent opportunity to address a vital question of great public interest and to announce a state-wide rule. The specific question presented is whether the State Employment Relations Board's dismissal of an unfair labor practice charge is a final order which may be appealed to the court of common pleas under R.C. 4117.13(D). This important question has never been addressed by this court. As a result of today's decision dismissing the instant appeal, trial courts and courts of appeals must continue to struggle with the issue without any guidance from this court, a situation which will inevitably cause confusion and conflict. Moreover, the parties to this appeal, having expended much time, energy and expense in pursuing their cause in this court, are denied the definitive answer which they have every right to believe is forthcoming.

I cannot concur in the majority's decision to squander this opportunity to formulate an authoritative rule on the important question presented by this case. Accordingly, I dissent.

SWEENEY, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COMMUNICATIONS WRKRS v. ST. EMP. REL. BD
(Sep 21, 1988)