TOLBERT v. MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 86-1188.

Attorney(S)

James A. Kaplan and Jack M. Wesoky, of Feuer, Flossic Rich, Englewood, Colo., for plaintiff-appellee. John R. Webb and Corin W. McIlnay, of Holme, Roberts Owen, Denver, Colo., for defendant-appellant.

Judges

William Judson Holloway
Wade Brorby

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

DEBORAH S. TOLBERT PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION, A MARYLAND CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ARTHUR BENJAMIN MARTINEZ, ALSO KNOWN AS A.B. MARTINEZ, THIRD-PARTY-DEFENDANT.

PER CURIAM.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.8. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

In accordance with the Colorado Supreme Court's decision in In re Tolbert v. Martin Marietta Corp., 759 P.2d 17 (Colo. 1988), the memorandum opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in Tolbert v. Martin Marietta Corp., 621 F. Supp. 1099 (D.Colo. 1985), is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enter summary judgment in favor of defendant Martin Marietta Corporation.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

DEBORAH S. TOLBERT PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION, A MARYLAND CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ARTHUR BENJAMIN MARTINEZ, ALSO KNOWN AS A.B. MARTINEZ, THIRD-PARTY-DEFENDANT.

Comments