Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF JAMES REGINOLD FAULK, SR., HUSBAND/APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE, v. PATRICIA ANN FAULK, WIFE/APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit to any issue raised on appeal or cross-appeal with the exception of the husband's contention that the trial court erred in awarding attorney's fees to the wife. The undisputed evidence reveals that the wife received marital property and income substantially equal to the husband, and thus she is in a position to bear the cost of her attorney's fees. See Cortina v. Cortina, 461 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FAULK v. FAULK
(Oct 19, 1988)