AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD HALL, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's challenge to the validity of the indictment is not reviewable on appeal from an ensuing judgment of conviction based upon legally sufficient evidence (CPL 210.30; People v Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d 97; People v O'Connor, 126 A.D.2d 676).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HALL
(Oct 24, 1988)