AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

FINANCE INVESTMENT COMPANY (BERMUDA) LIMITED et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT M. GOSSWEILER, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

An order of attachment against the defendant Gossweiler's real property to secure the sum of $250,000 was issued on April 1, 1987, and the notice of attachment was filed on April 8, 1987. Gossweiler subsequently sold the property on July 14, 1987, and tendered a check to his attorney in the sum of $250,000 which was placed in a separate escrow account. The plaintiffs only became aware of the sale on October 22, 1987, and moved to hold Gossweiler in criminal as well as civil contempt alleging that the sale of the property which was the subject of the attachment was a violation of orders of the court.

As an order of attachment does not bar sale of the attached property, Gossweiler did not violate any court order when he sold the property. Since the plaintiffs have failed to establish that Gossweiler violated any lawful order of the court and that they have been prejudiced by this sale, the court's denial of the contempt motion was proper (see, Matter of McCormick v Axelrod, 59 N.Y.2d 574, 583). Weinstein, J.P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FINANCE INV. CO. (BERMUDA) LTD. v. GOSSWEILER
(Dec 12, 1988)