Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Compensation of Tony Fazzolari, Claimant. FAZZOLARI, Petitioner, v. UNITED BEER DISTRIBUTORS et al, Respondents.

WARREN, J.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion adhered to.

WARREN, J.

Employer petitions for review of our opinion in Fazzolari v. United Beer Distributors, 91 Or. App. 592, 757 P.2d 857 (1988). We treat the petition as a petition for reconsideration, ORAP 10.10, and allow reconsideration for the purpose of amplifying our opinion. Employer contends that we incorrectly stated that claimant did not return to work until after August 12, 1985, when, in fact, he returned to work immediately after he was released for work on March 22, 1985. We reviewed this matter under ORS 656.298 (6) only for substantial evidence. Although there is some evidence to suggest that claimant returned to work when he was released for work in March, 1985, there is also evidence to support the referee's finding, which the Board affirmed, that claimant did not return to work until after August 12, 1985. We therefore adhere to our former opinion.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion adhered to.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FAZZOLARI v. UNITED BEER DISTRIBUTORS
(Dec 20, 1988)