Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JERSAWITZ v. BODIFORD.

PER CURIAM.

Jack Jersawitz appeals from the denial of his application for writ of prohibition asking the superior court to compel a magistrate to issue an arrest warrant against the clerk of the Cobb County Superior Court for violating the Open Records Act. The trial court found no gross abuse of discretion by the magistrate, who had ruled that Jersawitz had other remedies available to him, and denied issuance of the writ.

"The writ of prohibition is the counterpart of mandamus, to restrain subordinate courts and inferior judicial tribunals from exceeding their jurisdiction, where no other legal remedy or relief is given. The granting or refusal thereof is governed by the same principles of right, necessity, and justice as apply to mandamus." OCGA § 9-6-40.

We affirm. Shantha v. Municipal Court of Atlanta, 240 Ga. 280, 281 ( 240 S.E.2d 32) (1977); Buie v. Buie, 175 Ga. 27 ( 165 S.E. 15) (1932).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

PER CURIAM.

DECIDED JANUARY 19, 1989 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED FEBRUARY 8, 1989.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JERSAWITZ v. BODIFORD
(Jan 19, 1989)