Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Arthur James JULIUS v. STATE.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the contentions of the appellant in this cause and affirm it on the same grounds as those set out in the order of the circuit court.

Accordingly, the judgment of the circuit court denying appellant's petition under Rule 20, A.R.Crim.P.Temp., is due to be, and hereby is, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JULIUS v. STATE
(Jan 25, 1989)