AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

SONDRA BACHETY, Appellant, v. JULIETTE KINSELLA et al., Respondents, and COUNTY OF SUFFOLK et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The CPLR article 78 proceeding was properly dismissed since there is no allegation that up to this point an officer or body has failed to perform a duty enjoined upon it by law nor did any body or officer proceed in excess of jurisdiction (see, CPLR 7803). Any claims which anticipate such actions in the future are purely speculative.

The issue of whether an action for a declaratory judgment lies at the present time is different; however, here too we agree with the Supreme Court that any such judgment would presently be premature (see, CPLR 3001; New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Carey, 42 N.Y.2d 527). The existence of a controversy is contingent upon the happening of a future event "`which may never occur'" (Cuomo v Long Is. Light. Co., 71 N.Y.2d 349, 354; see also, New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Carey, supra, at 531). Under such circumstances, "any determination the court may make would be merely advisory since it can have no immediate effect and may never resolve anything (Borchard, Declaratory Judgments, pp 58-60)" (New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Carey, supra, at 531; see also, Cuomo v Long Is. Light. Co., supra, at 354-355).

Therefore, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the action and proceeding. Mollen, P.J., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BACHETY v. KINSELLA
(Jan 27, 1989)