Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WORLD SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. ELEANOR V. BODIFORD, ETC., RESPONDENT.

McDONALD, Justice.

We granted review of Bodiford v. World Service Life Insurance Company, 524 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), because of conflict with Miami Children's Hospital v. Tamayo, 529 So.2d 667 (Fla. 1988). The issue is whether Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145, 1151 (Fla. 1985), wherein we stated "in no case should the court-awarded fee exceed the fee agreement reached by the attorney and his client," is applicable to contingent-fee contracts made prior to 1985. In Tamayo we held that Rowe is applicable to such contracts.

Bodiford's counsel recognizes our holding in Tamayo, but argues that the trial judge miscalculated his fee under his contingent-fee contract by claiming that the attorney's fee percentage should be based on the amount of the insurance, plus interest and plus the award of attorney's fees. We reject this argument. Counsel's percentage fee is determined by the amount of principal coverage, plus interest. He is not entitled to add statutory attorney's fees to the principal and claim a percentage of this total.

The decision of the first district reversing the trial judge is therefore quashed. The cause is remanded with directions to approve the final judgment entered in this cause.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WORLD SERVICE LIFE INS. CO. v. BODIFORD
(Feb 16, 1989)